OPHIRDigital
London · for banks and payment firms in the UK and EULagos · Abuja · London · for Nigeria’s regulated institutions

Two systemsthat should agree.

We make them agree, and prove it: reconciliation, operational resilience and regulatory evidence for banks and payment firms — engineered by a team inside UK clearing and tier-one banks since 1998.We make them agree, and prove it: the integration, reconciliation and evidence layer behind your AML engine, NIP settlement and goAML filings — engineered inside UK clearing since 1998, delivered with local partners in Lagos and Abuja.

simulation · 0 matched0 in suspenseoldest 00:00:00
Inside the engine roomsince 1998
  • National paymentsThe UK’s central cheque-clearing infrastructure, through Bank of England settlement.
  • Two tier-one banksDodd-Frank/CCAR and EMIR programmes; treasury and FX lifecycles.
  • National healthA national programme’s first fully-cloud delivery.
  • Enterprise automationTechnical lead on an enterprise UiPath programme.
The engine room

Watch it reconcile. Every finding traces to a record.

An instant-payments day checked against the core ledger: matched, held in suspense, put on the clock, written up as evidence. Same input, same finding, every run.A NIP settlement day checked against the core ledger: matched, held in suspense, put on the 24- and 48-hour clocks, written up as evidence an examiner can walk.

ophir-engine · settlement assuranceready
01Ingest
02Match
03Clock
04Evidence
05Sign
ILLUSTRATIVE · SEPA INSTANT DAYAS AT 09 AUG 2026 · 15:30
0matched
0in suspense
€0suspense value
0breaches
E2E-7Q45BREACH
missing ledger · €19,750over window
E2E-7Q4440 MIN LEFT
amount mismatch · €48,000near window
E2E-7Q48IN WINDOW
return not posted · €5,600in window
E2E-7Q43IN WINDOW
duplicate · €2,100in window
Illustrative scenario · a SEPA Instant adapter is built per clientReference scenario · synthetic data · the engine’s own output
The rules you are already living underThe mandate, and the clocks that come with it

Four regimes. One evidence trail.One mandate. Every clock visible.

Each of these asks the same question in its own words: can you show that your systems agree, and what you did when they did not?The Baseline Standards ask for an engine that integrates, reconciles and stands up to a live examiner walkthrough. These are the dates that matter.

EU · DORA

Operational resilience

627days in force

ICT risk, incident reporting and resilience testing, with the evidence to show it.

EU · Instant Payments

Verification of Payee

362days in force

Instant credit transfers, checked and reconciled in seconds, not overnight.

ISO 20022 · CBPR+

Structured data, end to end

318days in force

Richer messages are only worth it if the ledger can match on them.

EU · AML Regulation

The single rulebook

277days to go

Transaction monitoring that links to customer risk, and proves it.

CBN · deposit money banks

Automated AML/CFT/CPF

339days to go

An engine integrated with core banking for real-time, cross-channel monitoring.

CBN · other financial institutions

The same standard

521days to go

Microfinance, payment service providers and the rest, six months later.

NIP · failed transactions

The settlement clocks

24h / 48h

On-us within 24 hours, not-on-us within 48. Our engine runs these clocks live.

NFIU · reporting

Filed, accepted, reconciled

goAML

Every report reconciled against the alert that raised it.

How we use AI

Models in the workshop. Determinism in the ledger.

AI makes us fast. The ledger runs on plain, tested code: the same input gives the same finding, every time. That line is where institutional-grade starts.

In the workshop

  • →Code, tests and documents drafted with AI, reviewed line by line by an engineer
  • →Adapters for a new file format drafted from a sample, then proved against it
  • →Synthetic twins of your data, so a build never needs the real thing
  • →Delivery in weeks rather than quarters

In the ledger

  • ■Matching and clocks as plain, reviewable code
  • ■The same input gives the same finding, every run
  • ■Every exception carries its evidence and its recommended action
  • ■Deliveries ship with a checksum and a detached signature
Next step

Bring the two systems that should agree.

A working session with the people who own the gap. We come back with where it leaks, what closing it is worth, and what a parallel run would prove.